This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Chell, E. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

The Entrepreneurial Personality: A Few Ghosts Laid to Rest?

Dr. Elizabeth Chell is Lecturer in Organisational Behaviour in the Department of Business and Administration, at the University of Salford, England. This paper considers critically three approaches to entrepreneurship; the psychodynamic, social development and trait models. It appears that the psychodynamic model relies on the stereotypic notion of the entrepreneur as a deviant; the social development model reduces to four stereotypes which are said to characterize the entrepreneur at different stages of life; and the trait approach is unable to identify reliably a trait which characterizes entrepreneurs and distinguishes them from other business persons. Other possible modification of the trait approach is to take into account the interaction of traits and situations as modifiers of behaviour. An alternative conceptualisation of entrepreneurship is put forward in which 'cognitive social learning variables' are substituted for traits, and Harr6's Situation-Act model is used as the basis for analysing how entrepreneurs relate to their business situation. Recent theoretical and empirical studies of entrepreneurship are used to provide the key concepts of person (entrepreneur) situations (business environment) fit.

International Small Business Journal, Vol. 3, No. 3, 43-54 (1985)
DOI: 10.1177/026624268500300303


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. Drakopoulou Dodd and A. R. Anderson Mumpsimus and the Mything of the Individualistic Entrepreneur International Small Business Journal, August 1, 2007; 25(4): 341 - 360. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. Mcadam and S. Marlow Building Futures or Stealing Secrets?: Entrepreneurial Cooperation and Conflict within Business Incubators International Small Business Journal, August 1, 2007; 25(4): 361 - 382. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. Fletcher and I. Hardill Value-Adding Competitive Strategies: A Comparison of Clothing SMEs Case Studies in France and Great Britain International Small Business Journal, October 1, 1995; 14(1): 33 - 52. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. Kitching, D. Smallbone, A. C. Pratt, P. Hobbs, P. Rosa, E. Chell, and D. A. Kirby Abstracts International Small Business Journal, April 1, 1991; 9(3): 73 - 88. [PDF]

				P. Lukacs, J. Curran, V. Fleck, L. R. Reid, A. Lowe, and T. Watkins Abstracts International Small Business Journal, July 1, 1990; 8(4): 77 - 88. [PDF]

				C. Mason, J. Curran, I. Roberts, E. Chell, P. Hobbs, and R. A. Blackburn Abstracts International Small Business Journal, April 1, 1990; 8(3): 64 - 78. [PDF]

				S. Slatter, R. Ransley, and E. Woods USM Chief Executives: Do They Fit the Entrepreneurial Stereotype? International Small Business Journal, April 1, 1988; 6(3): 10 - 23. [Abstract] [PDF]

				E. Chell Book Reviews International Small Business Journal, January 1, 1986; 4(2): 92 - 93. [PDF]

				J. Curran Book Reviews International Small Business Journal, October 1, 1985; 4(1): 92 - 94. [PDF]