Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information Leadership, Fifth Edition

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
International Small Business Journal
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Keasey, K.
Right arrow Articles by Watson, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The State of the Art of Small Firm Failure Prediction: Achievements and Prognosis

Kevin Keasey

Robert Watson

KEVIN KEASEY IS PROFESSOR OF accounting and finance at Leeds University, England, and Robert Watson is a member of the School of Management at University of Manchester Institute of Science and Technology, England. The main purpose of this paper is to review and assess the progress in developing small firm failure prediction models. It highlights a number of issues that are of particular importance in evaluating small firm failure prediction models and indicates where future research might be usefully directed. The authors conclude that while it is not yet clear whether they are worthwhile tools in many decision contexts, the present general models may provide material benefits as relatively cheap and simple-to-use preliminary screening devices for routine credit/lending decisions. This is because the classifications accuracy of even relatively simple quantitative models have been shown to outperform consistently human decision makers. If, however, predictive model is required as an input into more strategic decision making, then the utility of existing empirical models is much less certain.

International Small Business Journal, Vol. 9, No. 4, 11-29 (1991)
DOI: 10.1177/026624269100900401


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cornell Hotel and Restaurant Administration QuarterlyHome page
A. A. Camillo, D. J. Connolly, and Woo Gon Kim
Success and Failure in Northern California: Critical Success Factors for Independent Restaurants
Cornell Hospitality Quarterly, November 1, 2008; 49(4): 364 - 380.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
International Small Business JournalHome page
D. Fletcher and I. Hardill
Value-Adding Competitive Strategies: A Comparison of Clothing SMEs Case Studies in France and Great Britain
International Small Business Journal, October 1, 1995; 14(1): 33 - 52.
[Abstract] [PDF]