This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Grant, P. Articles by Perren, L. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Small Business and Entrepreneurial Research

Meta-theories, Paradigms and Prejudices

Lew Perren

Brighton Business School, University of Brighton

Small business and entrepreneurship has emerged as an important area of research over the past 40 years. Much of this development has been achieved by drawing on and adapting the theoretical frameworks of disciplines from outside. However, such diversity of disciplinary foundation does not necessarily result in a diversity of underlying meta-theoretical assumptions within an area. Other areas of the social sciences have benefited from the consideration of the meta-theoretical foundations of their research and as a consequence they have been able to extend their research into new agendas. There has been some meta-theoretic discussion of small business and entrepreneurial research, yet the review conducted for this project found no recent articles that provided a systematic analysis of contemporary research. This article will address this gap by employing Burrell and Morgan's (I1979) paradigmatic taxonomy to conduct a systematic meta-theoretical analysis of articles published in the year 2000 by leading authors in key small business and entrepreneurial journals. The analysis shows a dominance of the functionalist paradigm that pervades the elite discourse of research in leading journals and acts as a potential barrier to other perspectives. Whether a Hegelian or Kuhnian perspective on knowledge production is taken, it is clear that the health and future development of research in this area requires a broadening of perspectives to enable debate, friction, creativity and ultimately new theories and understandings.

Key Words: assumptions • meta-theory • paradigm • philosophy • review

International Small Business Journal, Vol. 20, No. 2, 185-211 (2002)
DOI: 10.1177/0266242602202004


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				D. De Clercq and M. Voronov The Role of Domination in Newcomers' Legitimation as Entrepreneurs Organization, November 1, 2009; 16(6): 799 - 827. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. De Clercq and M. Voronov Toward a Practice Perspective of Entrepreneurship: Entrepreneurial Legitimacy as Habitus International Small Business Journal, August 1, 2009; 27(4): 395 - 419. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. Doern Investigating Barriers to SME Growth and Development in Transition Environments: A Critique and Suggestions for Developing the Methodology International Small Business Journal, June 1, 2009; 27(3): 275 - 305. [Abstract] [PDF]

				V. Hanna and K. Walsh Interfirm Cooperation among Small Manufacturing Firms International Small Business Journal, June 1, 2008; 26(3): 299 - 321. [Abstract] [PDF]

				Z. Mottiar and S. Ingle Broadening the Entrepreneurial Perspective: Interpreneurship in an Irish Furniture Region International Small Business Journal, December 1, 2007; 25(6): 667 - 680. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. Drakopoulou Dodd and A. R. Anderson Mumpsimus and the Mything of the Individualistic Entrepreneur International Small Business Journal, August 1, 2007; 25(4): 341 - 360. [Abstract] [PDF]

				E. Chell Social Enterprise and Entrepreneurship: Towards a Convergent Theory of the Entrepreneurial Process International Small Business Journal, February 1, 2007; 25(1): 5 - 26. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. Curran Comment: 'Specificity' and 'Denaturing' the Small Business International Small Business Journal, April 1, 2006; 24(2): 205 - 210. [PDF]

				E. Shaw Small Firm Networking: An Insight into Contents and Motivating Factors International Small Business Journal, February 1, 2006; 24(1): 5 - 29. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. Lambrecht Multigenerational Transition in Family Businesses: A New Explanatory Model Family Business Review, December 1, 2005; 18(4): 267 - 282. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. R. Anderson Enacted Metaphor: The Theatricality of the Entrepreneurial Process International Small Business Journal, December 1, 2005; 23(6): 587 - 603. [Abstract] [PDF]

				L. Watkins-Mathys and S. Lowe Small Business and Entrepreneurship Research: The Way Through Paradigm Incommensurability International Small Business Journal, December 1, 2005; 23(6): 657 - 677. [Abstract] [PDF]

				T. M. Cooney Editorial: What is an Entrepreneurial Team? International Small Business Journal, June 1, 2005; 23(3): 226 - 235. [PDF]

				J. Cope Researching Entrepreneurship through Phenomenological Inquiry: Philosophical and Methodological Issues International Small Business Journal, April 1, 2005; 23(2): 163 - 189. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. Reveley, S. Down, and S. Taylor Beyond the Boundaries: An Ethnographic Analysis of Spatially Diffuse Control in a Small Firm International Small Business Journal, August 1, 2004; 22(4): 349 - 367. [Abstract] [PDF]

				L. Perren and M. Ram Case-Study Method in Small Business and Entrepreneurial Research: Mapping Boundaries and Perspectives International Small Business Journal, February 1, 2004; 22(1): 83 - 101. [Abstract] [PDF]