Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
International Small Business Journal
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Manolova, T. S.
Right arrow Articles by Yan, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Institutional Constraints and Entrepreneurial Responses in a Transforming Economy

The Case of Bulgaria

Tatiana S. Manolova

Aimin Yan

School of Management, Boston University

Previous research on entrepreneurship has largely focused on start-up firms in the relatively stable environment of developed economies, whereas scholarship on transforming economies has paid primary attention to large and established firms. Entrepreneurial efforts in a turbulent institutional environment during the radical reforms in the formerly centrally planned economies are still relatively understudied. Using a comparative case study method, this study examined how the reforming institutional environment in Bulgaria influenced the strategic behavior of entrepreneurial firms. We identified the key institutional entities/agents, the major characteristics of the institutional environment, and analyzed the strategic responses of the entrepreneurial companies and their performance implications. We found that lawmakers, tax collection agencies, and regional authorities issuing various business permits and licenses are among the key institutional players, and that the current institutional environment is unpredictable, corrupt, hostile, and detrimental to the growth of private entrepreneurial firms. Entrepreneurial responses, as a result, included short-term orientation, informal networking, opportunism, and surplus extraction. Theoretical and practical implications are provided.

Key Words: entrepreneurial strategies • institutional environment • transforming • economies

International Small Business Journal, Vol. 20, No. 2, 163-184 (2002)
DOI: 10.1177/0266242602202003
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 International Small Business JournalHome page
R. Doern
Investigating Barriers to SME Growth and Development in Transition Environments: A Critique and Suggestions for Developing the Methodology
International Small Business Journal, June 1, 2009; 27(3): 275 - 305.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 International Small Business JournalHome page
M. Ali Ulubasoglu, M. Akdis, and S. B. Kok
Internationalization and Alliance Formation: Evidence from Turkish SMEs
International Small Business Journal, June 1, 2009; 27(3): 337 - 361.
[Abstract] [PDF]